Appendices
Material relevant to the project but not required to understand the proposal. Appendices are excluded from the word limit.
Appendix 1: Group Charter
The charter agreed in Week 2.
Paste or attach the Week 2 group charter.
- Team values and ways of working
- Meeting cadence and communication channels
- How decisions are made and disagreements resolved
- What happens if a member does not contribute
- Signatures or agreement from every member
Appendix 2: Meeting Minutes
Minutes of group meetings held across the project.
Add dated minutes for each meeting. For each meeting record:
- Date, time and who attended
- Decisions made, and the reasoning behind each
- Actions assigned, with an owner and a due date
- Anything carried over to the next meeting
Minutes are useful evidence for the rubric’s design-process criterion: they show that the decisions on this website were actually made by the group rather than asserted after the fact.
Appendix 3: Statement on the Use of AI
A clear statement of use or non-use of generative AI, with the reasons, is required. This criterion is worth 3 of the 30 marks available.
This statement cannot be written for the team — it has to describe what actually happened. Note that generative AI was used in building this website, so the honest statement here is one of use, not non-use. Write it to cover:
- Which tools were used, by whom, and for what parts of the project
- Why the group chose to use them, and where it chose not to
- What the group did to check and edit AI output — especially factual claims and citations
- Which writing on this site is the group’s own
For full marks the statement must be accompanied by screenshots of the prompts used and the output generated. Put those in Appendix 4.
Check every citation independently. Generative AI invents plausible-looking sources. Each reference on this site should be opened and confirmed before submission.
Appendix 4: Prompt Log
Full log of prompts used and responses received.
Add each prompt, the tool used, the date and the output, with screenshots. A workable format is a table with one row per prompt:
- Date and tool used
- Group member who ran the prompt
- The prompt, in full
- A summary of the output received
- What was kept, what was rewritten, and what was discarded
- A screenshot of the exchange
Appendix 5: Prototype Testing Records
Full results of the paper walk-through, once it has been run. Referred to from Section 5.5.
Add the marked-up test sheets, photographs of the sessions, the timing data and the full notes. The summary on the prototyping page should then point here.
Appendix 6: Risk Register
The six risks assessed for the pilot, with likelihood and planned response (Table 4). Summarised in Section 7.1.
| Risk | Likelihood | Response |
|---|---|---|
| Wet weather or a cyclone cancels a block | Medium | Backup dates in the same season; offline school tasks. |
| Too few Rangers or Elders available | Medium | Cap the cohort to mentor numbers; prepare several mentors. |
| Sensitive knowledge shared wrongly | Low | Elders decide what is shared; no recording without fresh consent. |
| Partners do not confirm credit or hiring | Medium | The pathway still runs; partner items stay marked pending. |
| Funding ends after the pilot | Medium | Apply to more than one source; keep costs low using existing Ranger work. |
| Junior Rangers lose track between holidays | Medium | A printed record they keep, and a named contact. |