EWB Challenge 2026 · Design Area 4: Augmenting the Ranger ProgramDavid’s Friends · UTS
School-to-Ranger PathwayLama Lama Country · Port Stewart
Section 05 — Prototyping

A one-page offline calendar and progress record

What was prototyped and why, how it was made, and the test designed to check it.

5.1What to prototype

Why this, and not the pathway itself

The pathway cannot be prototyped without the community. The progress record can.

It is the only component a young person handles, and its failure mode is testable by a stranger: if someone cannot read the sheet and say what happens next, the design fails the clarity criterion. Paper was chosen over any digital tool because connectivity at Port Stewart is unreliable.

The best Ranger tools work offline and need minimal training.

Engineers Without Borders Australia, 2026, p. 38
5.2Construction

How it was made

Version 0.1 is one A4 sheet, printed in colour on an ordinary office printer.

Drafted on paper, then set at A4 with each stage panel sized for three tasks, a day count and two signature boxes. It was filled in by hand as a worked example so a reader sees it in use rather than blank (Figure 5).

The printed calendar and progress record, filled in as an example Junior Ranger in Stage 2
Figure 5. Prototype v0.1 of the one-page calendar and progress record, filled in as an example Junior Ranger partway through Stage 2.
5.3What it does

What is on the page, and why

Year calendar

Seasons, school holidays, blocks with backup dates, and the YAC review.

Four stage panels

Three tasks to tick, days to fill in, notes, and two sign-offs.

Rules strip

Turn up, stay safe, respect culture, ask questions, and a named contact.

Partner flags

Trials and credit marked as needing approval.

Plain languageNo power or internet neededCultural permissions respected
5.4Test method

The paper walk-through

Hand the sheet to someone with no explanation, then ask five questions.

Giving no introduction is deliberate: on Country the sheet is often read without an adult beside it. Responses are timed and anything misread is circled. Participants would be Junior Ranger-aged, arranged through YAC.

  1. When’s your next day on Country?
  2. What if it rains?
  3. In Stage 2, what’s left?
  4. How do you finish a stage?
  5. Who do you call?

Pass criteria

  • Four of five questions answered unaided
  • Next day on Country found in under 30 seconds
  • No partner-approval item read as a promise

Planned response

  • Rewrite anything two or more testers misread
  • YAC and Elders choose the real stage tasks
  • Add language and artwork only with permission
5.5Results

Results and modifications

The walk-through has been designed but not run, so no results are claimed and v0.1 is unmodified.

Testing with Junior Rangers needs YAC consent and ethics approval the team does not hold; approaching young people without it would breach the cultural authority this proposal depends on. The method is therefore specified here for YAC to authorise.

To be completed by the team

Replace with results once the walk-through has run. Record:

  • Who tested it, how many, and when
  • Questions answered unaided, and time to find the next block
  • Anything misread or circled as confusing
  • What changed, and the new version number

Photographs and marked-up sheets go in Appendix 5.

Running this test before the pilot is listed as a recommendation in Section 7.2.

Acknowledgement of Country

We acknowledge the Lama Lama People as the Traditional Owners of the land and sea Country around Princess Charlotte Bay, where this project is based, and pay our respects to Elders past and present. We also acknowledge the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation, on whose land UTS stands and where this work was produced.